|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
MINE INFORMATION |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
CAMPAIGN |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
WHAT YOU CAN DO |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
CONTACT |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
| |
|
The Wyong Experiment
The Wallarah 2 Coal Project
Wyong Water Catchment Valleys
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is the
Central Coast community nothing more than laboratory rats? |
|
|
|
|
|
Longwall coal mining beneath the Dooralong and Yarramalong valleys
has the potential to adversely compromise the integrity of water
systems, both surface and subsurface.
There is substantive and compelling evidence that
subsidence can cause the loss of our
water catchment.
At
the June 2006 Wallarah 2 Coal Project community liaison meeting, Mr
Graham Cowan, a senior engineer with the Department of Primary
Industries, said this about subsidence predications and subsequent
damage: “Until it (the longwall coal mine) is mined you won’t
know, things will change and they will be dealt with.”
A serious question now arises: "If a senior mining engineer cannot
give a definitive answer as to expected subsidence damage from the
Wallarah 2 Coal Project, why should it even be considered?"
|
|
|
Northern Geoscience Report
|
|
|
The Wallarah 2 Coal Project said on their web page about the
Northern Geoscience Report:
"There has been some media coverage on
this issue where it has been suggested that this project is the same
as the Sydney Gas Project and that a report had been done which
supposedly proves that underground mining will cause loss of
groundwater and flows in rivers. This is not correct. The report
undertaken by Northern Geosciences on behalf of the Australian Gas
Alliance speculated on the potential effects of gas production wells
in the Dooralong Valley.
A response to this report has been made by the Department of Primary
Industries. Irrespective of the scientific validity of the report,
the fact remains that the proposed Wallarah No 2 Coal Project will
be extracting coal at considerable depths where the only groundwater
to enter the mine will be saline."
ACA
Response
-
There has never been any suggestion
in the media that this project is the same as Sydney Gas.
-
The report dealt with the problems
that would arise from 200 or more gas wells being built in the
Dooralong and Yarramalong Valleys and the impact that it would
have on the underground water systems.
-
The response from the Department of
Primary Industries (DPI) did not deal with the issue of 200 or
more gas wells, but only focused on two (2) test wells that were
being drilled and their likely impact.
-
The conclusions drawn by the DPI
were not valid in respect of Sydney Gas' intentions, that was to
build more than two (2) wells. This fact was made very clear to
Kores (the mining company who owns the Wallarah 2 project) at
the community liaison committee meeting by community member Mr
Warrick O'Rourke (retired environmental lawyer).
-
According to a report by
Salient Solutions Australia Pty Ltd,
water from the aquifers is at risk, and is finding its way into
the coal measures beneath the Wyong water catchment valleys.
|
|
|
Other questions posed on the Wallarah 2 web
site
|
|
|
What happens to rivers and waterways?
Wallarah 2 response
"There are
a few, though well documented cases of underground mining causing
impacts on rivers and creeks . . . While
any such risk of permanent damage to waterways is considered very
low, the company acknowledges that it will be fully responsible for
repairing any damage that may be caused. . . .
Any damage must be fully remediated as soon as practicable."
ACA
Response
-
Many rivers and creeks have
disappeared from subsidence damage,
including extensive damage to the Sydney metropolitan water
supply rivers and creeks. There are numerous
scientific and commissioned reports
that verify this irreparable damage.
-
Despite the best efforts of the
mining companies, stream bed damage repairs have been
unsuccessful. Being responsible for repairing the damage
means absolutely nothing . . . once the water has gone, it's
gone forever.
-
The question of remediating "any
damage as soon as practical" is highly suspect and an
erroneous claim. Existing evidence clearly demonstrates that
subsidence damage to streams, including aquifers, cannot be repaired.
-
What does "as soon as practical" refer to? At
the completion of the mining lease in 42 years? It is not a
time-specific commitment by the mining company.
-
Damage to rivers and creeks may be
considered low to the mining company, but it is a high priority
for the Central Coast community who depend on the Dooralong and
Yarramalong Valleys for 53% of their water catchment area.
-
See
Rivers of Shame
media story on the impact longwall coal mining had on Diega
Creek in Lake Macquarie district. Cracking of the riverbed from
subsidence caused the water to disappear into the mine. Despite
attempts to remediate the damage, it has been unsuccessful and
Diega Creek is now a dry river bed.
|
|
|
Will any
groundwater enter the mine?
Wallarah 2 response
"Yes, however this water exists within and just above the
coal seam. No surface water will enter the mine as a result of
mining."
ACA
Response
-
The mining company claim that the geology is
different. Their claim is that because the strata
above the coal seam is tightly packed, surface and subsurface aquifers (that feed
the river systems) cannot enter the mine. This statement is
incorrect.
According to the report by
Salient Solutions Australia Pty Ltd,
water from the aquifers is at risk, and is finding its way into
the coal measures beneath the Wyong water catchment valleys.
-
Subsidence damage causes cracking all the way to the
surface. This will provide conduits for ground water and subsurface
aquifers to travel down into the mine.
|
|
|
Will the Mine
affect the water supply catchment?
Wallarah 2 response
"The project will in fact increase the total usable water for
both the community and the environment. We will be installing a
water treatment plant which will treat saline water contained in the
coal seam making it available for other purposes. The final uses of
this excess water will ultimately be determined by the government."
ACA
Response
|
|
|
Back to top of page
|
|
|